Grammy committee says Hag is not bluegrass

Merle Haggard - The Bluegrass SessionsThe nominating committee for the National Academy Of Recording Arts & Sciences, who distribute the Grammy Awards each year, decided yesterday that the new release from Merle Haggard, titled The Bluegrass Sessions would not be eligible for Grammy consideration in the Best Bluegrass Album category in this year’s voting.

Billboard reported today that despite the CD being #1 on their Bluegrass chart the past four weeks, the new Haggard album would be considered in the Best Country Album category instead.

Chris Harris of McCoury Music, who released The Bluegrass Sessions, expressed some frustration with NARAS over this decision.

“When I contacted NARAS, they would not identify the committee, their qualifications, or why they don’t classify this album as bluegrass. Their stance just doesn’t make sense. With that said, of course, we’re grateful that members can at least vote for The Bluegrass Sessions in other country categories, including Country Album of the Year,” Harris said. “But by every reasonable definition, this is a bluegrass album, and we–Merle, Ronnie [Reno], Del [McCoury] and everyone involved in the project–think that Academy voters ought to be able to consider it for Best Bluegrass Album.”

6 Comments
Leave a comment
Comments are open and unmoderated for our registered users, only your first comment will require approval before publication. Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of The Bluegrass Blog. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by The Bluegrass Blog.

comment #37949 By 1969mets on 11.02.07 11:25 am

It actually would be a far greater statement for bluegrass if the album were nominated in the Country Music category.

But, really, I couldn’t give a lousy G-run about silly awards.

comment #37952 By martinmcwhorter on 11.02.07 3:39 pm

This is crap. Is this the same committee that gave the award to Bruce Hornsby the first year it was offered. That was a godawful sin to give the award to that piano tinkler.

comment #37954 By Grassin Gal on 11.02.07 4:57 pm

Honestly, music awards have been headed towards main stream Hollywood for quite some time now. You just never know what they are going to pull next. I remeber being a little girl and actually hearing bluegrass on the country music awards show. Now, it’s models with pretty voices…it’s just not as true as bluegrass. As one person said, maybe this will get bluegrass out to more people since they are considering this album to be country. We can only hope for the best. LST said it best…”Muder on Music Row”.

comment #37959 By mefloyd on 11.02.07 11:23 pm

I am very happy to see the NARAS come to their senses and disqualify this CD as a Bluegrass project. I love the Hag, and this CD is a fine one indeed, but please, don’t try to tell me it’s Bluegrass.

“But by every reasonable definition, this is a bluegrass album, and we–Merle, Ronnie [Reno], Del [McCoury] and everyone involved in the project–think that Academy voters ought to be able to consider it for Best Bluegrass Album.”

I would love to know the reasonable definitions by which this CD could be considered Bluegrass. What? Is it because there is mandolin and banjo involved? I’m afraid the singing style alone is enough to say “no way,” it simply is not Bluegrass. What we have here is pure country done with what we like to call the traditional Bluegrass instruments.

I like Merle Haggard and I like this CD but I’m glad it’s not being categorized as Bluegrass by the NARAS.

comment #37971 By formerfiddler on 11.03.07 8:03 am

Love the Hag, BUT,it ain’t bluegrass. Just his stuff (GREAT STUFF) with some acoustic back-up. I was disappointed when I first heard the album. Thought he would have at least done some Flatt & Scruggs or Monroe. I agree with the board.

comment #37974 By f5joe on 11.03.07 9:20 am

I love the Hag! But Hag, you ARE country. I’m a bit tired of the country elders attempting to gain audience in the BG world. Again, love the Hag.

Same goes for BG artists trying to go country. It’s a genre thing.

Love the Hag!

TrackBack URI

You must

  • Register
  • and Log in in to leave comments.

    Hag still miffed by Grammy snub

    We ran the story in November '07 when the nominating committee for the Grammy Awards determined that...

    More bluegrass Grammy news

    There are a number of other bluegrass artists with Grammy nominations announced yesterday. Rhonda...

    Haggard and bluegrass and Krauss… oh my!

    Billboard is reporting a couple of new bits of information about the upcoming Merle Haggard acoustic/bluegrass...

    Bluegrass Grammy nominations

    The nominees for the 51st Grammy Awards have been announced, and the bluegrass category is filled with...

    A few more Grammy notes…

    As we ponder the results of the 2008 Grammies - and breathe a sigh of relief that Cherryholmes didn't...

    Bluegrass Grammy nominees

    The nominees for the 50th Grammy Awards were announced today, and a number of bluegrass/acoustic artists...

    Merle Haggard’s New Release – Bluegrass Sessions

    In a career spanning more than 40 years, country music legend MERLE HAGGARD has found a new direction...

    Cherryholmes Tweet The Grammies

    With Grammy weekend fast approaching, a  number of bluegrass artists are preparing to make the trip...

    Haggard talks bluegrass on NPR

    National Public Radio's afternoon news and information show, All Things Considered, featured an interview...

    Haggard tracks available online

    McCoury Music has made audio samples available online from their upcoming Merle Haggard CD, The Bluegrass...

    Haggard bluegrass session video online

    McCoury Music has now posted an online video of the first recording session for his upcoming release,...

    Haggard talks bluegrass with Sun-Times

    Today's (9/30) edition of The Chicago Sun-Times has an interview with Merle Haggard, primarily about...