<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daughters Of Bluegrass on YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/daughters-of-bluegrass-on-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/daughters-of-bluegrass-on-youtube/</link>
	<description>News at the speed of Bluegrass!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:47:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/daughters-of-bluegrass-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/daughters-of-bluegrass-on-youtube/#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>You are, or course, correct. I edited the post to show the date of the IBMA Awards presentation to read &quot;October 28, 2006.&quot;

Good eye - thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are, or course, correct. I edited the post to show the date of the IBMA Awards presentation to read &#8220;October 28, 2006.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good eye &#8211; thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.J. Fuller</title>
		<link>http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/daughters-of-bluegrass-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J. Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/daughters-of-bluegrass-on-youtube/#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, but unless John has become a seer of some sort, I suspect the date should have been &quot;October 28, 2006&quot;.

Sorry to be a pest - keep up the excellent work!
A.J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, but unless John has become a seer of some sort, I suspect the date should have been &#8220;October 28, 2006&#8243;.</p>
<p>Sorry to be a pest &#8211; keep up the excellent work!<br />
A.J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
