Congressional hearing 6/28 on web royalty rates

Us House of RepresentativesTomorrow, June 28, The Small Business Committee of the US House of Representatives will conduct a full committee hearing on the hotly contested new royalty rates proposed by the Copyright Royalty Board. The topic of the hearing is officially given as: Assessing the Impact of the Copyright Royalty Board Decision to Increase Royalty Rates on Recording Artists and Webcasters.

The slate of panelists invited to speak includes the groups that have been active in the roiling debate over these new rates – artists and labels likely to insist that the new rates provide them a fair share of income generated from their work, the musician’s union which will agree, and public radio and webcasters who will declare that the new rates hamper their ability to offer a wide variety of music programming online.

We should mention that banjo player, songwriter and storyteller, Cathy Fink, is among the artists invited to speak.

In a number of previous posts on this topic, we have noted disagreements erupting within our bluegrass community over this debate, breaking into the same camps as indicated above.

At The Bluegrass Blog, we encourage the artistic side to be wary of the incentives that these new rates create for businesses who produce – or might produce – web radio content that features bluegrass, old time, folk or acoustic music. Regardless of the intentions of this new structure, making it far more costly for our music to be streamed online will inevitably result in less of it being heard on the Internet. In a narrow, niche segment of the market, we see little gain in artists/labels fighting for a larger share of what would become a rapidly shrinking pie.

Further, we feel that the direction the market is taking is one where distribution as we have traditionally known it becoming ever more irrelevant, and the ability to filter content and promote/publicize your music online will be the dominant factor in increasing sales. This is not to say that a royalty rate where artists and songwriters get a larger share isn’t a defensible position, only that looking for it as a replacement for income lost by declining CD sales might end up throttling an important promotional vehicle in its cradle.

Tomorrow’s hearing is set for 10:00 a.m. (EDT). C-SPAN has not yet posted its full schedule for 6/28, as they often make decisions on which hearings are of higher import at the last minute, so check their schedule on Thursday morning if you have interest in catching it live – or perhaps shown pre-recorded later in the day.

UPDATE 1:00 p.m.: On a related note… Gracie Muldoon, General manager of WorldWideBluegrass.com, has a post on The B where she discusses WWB’s reasons for not going silent during this past Tuesday’s Day Of Silence campaign to protest the new CRB rate proposal.

1 Comment
Leave a comment
Comments are open and unmoderated for our registered users, only your first comment will require approval before publication. Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of The Bluegrass Blog. Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by The Bluegrass Blog.

comment #30526 By Jon Weisberger on 06.29.07 12:39 am

And I would encourage the Bluegrass Blog and readers to be wary of taking the claims of webcasters concerning the crippling effects of a 10th of a cent royalty at face value, and to consider whether it’s equitable for webcasters to seek to cap their costs not by lobbying for a freeze on electric rates, nor demanding that the government cap server and Internet access prices, etc., but solely by freezing (or even rolling back) payments to the folks who are actually supplying them with the content that’s driving consumers to their sites. I would be a lot more inclined to take those claims seriously if the webcasters were willing to open their books to the public and show their entire revenue-expense pictures, rather than use debatable (to put it charitably) calculations and figures that show only a portion of the expense side.

TrackBack URI

You must

  • Register
  • and Log in in to leave comments.

    House Small Business Committee testimony on YouTube

    Testimony from this morning's full committee hearing in the US House of Representatives Small Business...

    Copyright Royalty Board upholds new rates

    We've followed the news of the CRB's recent copyright royalty decision very closely here on The Bluegrass...

    Internet Radio Saved?

    With the July 15th deadline for the new internet radio royalties fast approaching, webcasters were starting...

    Internet radio discussion on WAMU

    We have posted a number of times in the past few months about the new royalty rates for Internet radio...

    CRB sets royalty rates for satellite radio

    With controversy and legal action still taking place over the rates set for internet radio, the Copyright...

    Save Our Internet Radio

    Save Our Internet Radio is a new blog launched this week in response to the proposed royalty rates recently...

    NPR motion for rehearing on new online royalty rates

    The topic of the newly reconstituted royalty rates for cybercasting - Internet radio - has been covered...

    Musician’s union responds to webcasters’ backlash

    Hal Ponder, the Legislative Director for the American Federation of Musicians (AFM), circulated a message...

    SoundExchange offer to small webcasters

    In the ongoing debate over the new CRB royalty rates, small webcasters were granted a reprieve yesterday...

    Death of Internet Radio?

    As we've discussed previously here and here, the recent rate hike by the Copyright Royalty Board could...

    CRB and mechanical royalty rates

    Last year a raging battle ensued over the performance royalty rates for internet radio. That battle continues...

    BluegrassCountry.org observes Day Of Silence

    Bluegrass fans who turn to BluegrassCountry.org for their 24/7 bluegrass fix will be in for a shocker...