<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bluegrass on year end lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/bluegrass-on-year-end-lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/bluegrass-on-year-end-lists/</link>
	<description>News at the speed of Bluegrass!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:52:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Royko</title>
		<link>http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/bluegrass-on-year-end-lists/comment-page-1/#comment-55293</link>
		<dc:creator>David Royko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/bluegrass-on-year-end-lists/#comment-55293</guid>
		<description>I hear you--for a number of years now, I&#039;ve submitted my year-end piece to the Trib under the heading &quot;Bluegrass/Newgrass&quot; and always wonder what the piece will appear under. This year, it was &quot;FOLK/BLUEGRASS&quot;. So it goes. Here&#039;s the full piece with comments (don&#039;t know if the Trib keeps it up beyond 7 days):
http://www.geocities.com/davidroyko/BestOf2008.html
As for newgrass, I think all but the Stanley disc falls squarely into the &quot;newgrass&quot; catagory, but of course, WINA? ;-)
Dave Royko</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you&#8211;for a number of years now, I&#8217;ve submitted my year-end piece to the Trib under the heading &#8220;Bluegrass/Newgrass&#8221; and always wonder what the piece will appear under. This year, it was &#8220;FOLK/BLUEGRASS&#8221;. So it goes. Here&#8217;s the full piece with comments (don&#8217;t know if the Trib keeps it up beyond 7 days):<br />
<a href="http://www.geocities.com/davidroyko/BestOf2008.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocities.com/davidroyko/BestOf2008.html</a><br />
As for newgrass, I think all but the Stanley disc falls squarely into the &#8220;newgrass&#8221; catagory, but of course, WINA? <img src='http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Dave Royko</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mwrowe</title>
		<link>http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/bluegrass-on-year-end-lists/comment-page-1/#comment-55257</link>
		<dc:creator>mwrowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebluegrassblog.com/bluegrass-on-year-end-lists/#comment-55257</guid>
		<description>Interesting-- do any of these albums actually qualify as bluegrass?  Or even newgrass?  Sure, they all have banjo, but beyond that...  even the Ralph Stanley album is clawhammer, which I always took as one of the things that distinguishes old timey from bluegrass.

Don&#039;t get me wrong-- these are great albums!  But what does it say about the state of bluegrass?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8211; do any of these albums actually qualify as bluegrass?  Or even newgrass?  Sure, they all have banjo, but beyond that&#8230;  even the Ralph Stanley album is clawhammer, which I always took as one of the things that distinguishes old timey from bluegrass.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8211; these are great albums!  But what does it say about the state of bluegrass?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
