Comments on: Bluegrass Blasphemy?

By: guit30

guit30 — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:27:56 +0000

Honestly, I don’t know what Kitty Wells and Polish singers have to do with Alison Krauss. She has an Angelic voice, with the best bunch of pickers in her band. I don’t agree with her running around this year ,promoting her CD from last year with Robert Plant(of Led Zeppelin), There is traditional bluegrass and what I call new grass, which Alison seems to represent more.
Bluegrass doesn’t miss her, We still have plenty of great bluegrass bands around and singers and pickers. She will be back, her type of jam music drifts, but it always comes back to the Union Station.
Jim Moulton

By: Brad Harper

Brad Harper — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:33:29 +0000

“In other news, irrelevant critic offers unsolicited opinion…”

Wow, I can only imagine Alison’s utter devastation in facing a negative review from some disgruntled comic-book critic.

Surely Mr. Berlatsky can perceive the audible delineation of mainstream country and the niche occupied, owned and created by Krauss? Even the most staunch purist I associate with appreciate the undeniably appealing musicianship of AKUS. What he calls overproduced, I call the sparkling culmination of the best musicians, engineers and sonic energy on the planet.

In my own unsolicited opinion, it’s too bad some ears are clogged by skepticism and religious intolerance – not to mention such confusion regarding the ideals of Capitalism.

By: argie

argie — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:35:59 +0000

Let’s face it…there is a lot of plain BAD bluegrass or music that gets categorized as bluegrass. I guess part of the problem is defining a genre that is as multi-faceted. People are generally quick to tell you that they either hate it or love it. I’ve been picking for more than 40 years and have yet to be able to say for sure what is bluegrass or what is not. If one wants to be a purist, Bluegrass vs. bluegrass would be the music of Bill Monroe vs anything else with 5-string 3-finger banjo, fiddle, mandolin, guitar, bass. Then you have to decide whether to include resophonic guitar, autoharp, dulcimer, tenor banjo, clawhammer banjo etc. Bluegrass is the victim of its own success(finally) but if it had to depend on nose-singers whining in too-high keys, singing maudlin tales of death and poverty, it would have remained in the backwoods and hollers of the Appalachians. Its discovery as a folk-art form and its transcendence into a quaint “authentic” music would have to lead naturally to interpretation by those “less authentic.” The embracing of the music by classically-trained musicians would therefore indicate a higher level of musical competence by those who, not able to evoke authenticity, would provoke curiosity at least. While not a big fan of AK, I admire her talent and success and appreciate the wider audience to whom she appeals. Many, who having heard her, have chosen to give bluegrass a “second listen,” wher they previously may not have.

By: 1969mets

1969mets — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:16:09 +0000

I’ve been reading this story my entire life…since discovering the New Grass Revival and John Hartford’s music in the early 1970s. I imagine it was happening with the Osborne Brothers and the Country Gentlemen before that. It’s really just a question of semantics. I loved the NGR and I love bluegrass, but I wouldn’t consider NGR’s music bluegrass for the most part. Heck, Bill Monroe played wonderful music I wouldn’t call bluegrass (listen to his “My Last Days On Earth”!)

The blogger seems to be riffing on the distastefulness of using the term “bluegrass” as a marketing ploy, especially to a purist. He has a point. And it happens that Alison Krauss has been the poster child for this movement for quite some time now. She has made some bluegrassers a lot of money, I suspect. But she, for the most part, does not play bluegrass…especially as far as purists are concerned.